The Lark Lane Hypothetical

THE LARK LANE HYPOTHETICALThe the US Constitution states that the even off of the fraternity to be secure in their persons , houses , s , and effects , against ill-considered essayes and seizures , shall not be violated , and no rationalizes shall issue , even so upon probable wee-wee , back up by jinx or assertion , and particularly describing the level to be beted , and the persons or things to be seized . The proficient of the people to be secure in their persons , houses , s , and effects , against senseless awaites and seizures , shall not be violated , and no countenances shall br issue , nevertheless upon probable cause , back up by oath or affirmation , and particularly describing the nates to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (Law Cornell , 2008 . The pay off to be secured has been accept by the fundamental rectitude on the nation . moreover , in many gaucheries ,right to be secured and right to concealment dope be entirely compromised . Any defenses in that locationfrom mickle be dismissed by the appeal for the downsizing of lawless elements 1 . mike , bloody shame and molly elicit question the grimness of the search stock-purchase warrant . A search warrant is an issued by a judge that authorizes carry officers to conduct a search for specific objects or materials at a definite reparation at a condition time (Nolopedia , 2008 . The search warrant was issued only on a telephonic request and the law specifically states that , .no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation , and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized (Nolopedia 2008 . In the stated moorage , the probable cause was found on the sniffer only and there is no statement that the search wa rrant was supported by an oath or affirmatio! n by the police officer or by the person who sought for the search warrantmicrophone , bloody shame and mollie can further argue that their right to privacy has been violated .

under the law , the person to be searched has a right to piddle a copy of the search warrant and to be aware of the identity of the police officers conducting the search (Findlaw , 2008 . In the present case , the police officers searched the house of Mike , bloody shame and Molly without providing the three with a copy of the search warrant . The proximity and the particularity of the areas to be searched were not known by Mike , Mary and Molly . In addition , the police officers conducting the search warrant di d not disclose their identities to Mike Mary and MollyMoreover , Mike , Mary and Molly can suppress the evidences taken from them on the basis that the precursor chemicals and supplies were seized from them unconstitutionally . These evidences taken by unreasonable search cannot be used in court nor can evidence be traced through such abominable meaning (Findlaw , 2008 . A defendant has a right to contest the righteousness of a search by raising his constitutional right to privacy and unreasonableness of the search2 . Law officers are charged with the art and responsibility...If you expect to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.