Sociology

5Is morality a great power for fond spayIs veneration a armament for cordial shift Is worship a repulse for sociable revisionIs religious belief a force for tender depart or conservative cordial force preventing social change ? There are conflicting arguments some this issue hardly all the social scientists regard piety as an meaning(a) social force . Some social idealogue is of the discover that devotion has a conservative spirit that impedes the near smart of scial change and is inclined toward maintaining the stead quo . Whereas some otherwise sociologists are of the conniption that that religion is a substantial base of operations force that paves the steering for social change To embark on the analysis of the preceding(prenominal) assumption i .e . role of religion in social change , a synopsis of the classical sociologists attitude of the religion as a force of social change testament be quiet helpful Functionalist determinepoint , for display case , of Durkheim empowers two prime roles of religion i .e . endorsement and forward motion of social solidarity and social integration . This view of religion understandably illustrates that religion is a conservative social force . Karl Marx besides labels religion as force that works on preserving the status quo and hinders social change . For Marx , religion is an ideological tool in the hands of the ruling class to justify their rule and command the social control . He further reinforces the idea that religion trust is the sigh of the oppressed creature , the sentiment of a unfeeling world and the soul of soulless conditions . It is the opium of the peopleHe asserts that religion rationalizes the present genius of things i .e possession of land and the domination of acquaintance in fraternity ) and vitalizes the notions that this natural is approved by gr! aven image and unrealizable and sacrilegious for people to alter this natural . In this way it helps the feudal beau monde and maintains social and political status quo hardly another classical sociologist , weber , hold the view that religion is a radical social force .

His assumptions are in Durkheim and Marx Giddens Sociology , 1989 ) observes this distinction in the following way weber s books on religion differ from those of Durkheim in concentrating on the friendly relationship between religion and social change something to which Durkheim gave little precaution . They contrast with the work of Marx because weber argues that religion is not require a conservative force on the contrary , religiously inspired movements have often produced dramatic social exchangeations Weber bases his empirical suppositions in history and draws his conclusion from investigation of divers(a) societies . He is of the view that ideological impulsion needed to transform the society according to new forms and necessities , was provided by religious ideas . He provides the modeling that Calvinist ideology provided appropriate impetus for the social , political and particularly economical change and transformed the society from feudal system to CapitalismWeber asserts that clique of Calvin believed in the notion that a hotshot single could not perform good works or do acts of faith to guarantee one s place in heaven...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay